🔗 Share this article

I possess some opinions about that comments delivered by ESPN commentator a well-known announcer following Novak Djokovic's victory over the American player during the US Open quarter-finals. Consider – Fritz is American, the commentator is American – and athletic competitions often encourage patriotic sentiment. Some letdown would have been understandable. Rather, he brought up the continued absence of American men at grand slam tournaments: none of them had lifted a title since the last American champion in 2003, and he had been the final representative in the tournament.

We all love a narrative, me too. But really. Even if Fritz had beaten Djokovic for the first time, force of nature the Spanish star was waiting in the following match, who he has never defeated in an competitive encounter. And if he’d someway gotten past that, it would have been defending champion Jannik Sinner, versus him Fritz had dropped 10 of the previous eleven sets. Alcaraz and Sinner had also divided the last seven major titles (plus Alcaraz went on to defeat a tired Djokovic in the subsequent match). Fritz said in post-match interviews after the loss that he in fact liked his draw, because it offered the opportunity to defeat the top three players in the world back-to-back. He is well justified to aim for the accomplishment; an athlete is supposed to believe in themselves. But entering that Djokovic last eight match what other person sensibly had the drought of US winners on the brain?

The American star's weaker delivery the sole barrier standing in her way and sustained success

Fritz, twenty-eight, is ranked number four in the world starting this week’s ATP World Tour Finals and has won his last six matches over No 3 Alexander Zverev with growing comfort. It's likely he could claim that position for himself in the future. But evidently that at present, that’s as far as he can rise: The Italian and Spaniard sit a chasm of performance metrics away. Fritz’s top-class serve and powerful strength on both forehand and backhand are sufficiently enough to dispose of most rivals on the ATP tour. When facing the handful of generational talents, though, Fritz is often helpless. The last several seasons has seen the interesting emergence of tall, gangly players who can nonetheless move around with the alarming quickness and grace of smaller players. Fritz is 6ft 5ins and appears that way. His movement is rigid, as if he’s still getting used to his legs. So he seldom win a rally that the opponent was controlling, and hitting a drop shot versus him is typically a safe bet. That acts as a pretty severe limitation on his upside.

Fritz has achieved a number of significant, improbable improvements throughout his career. Early on of the decade, he was hovering around the lower end of the top 30. 24 months after, he was sniffing the top 10. The previous season, he unexpectedly exploded up to No 4 – and maintained the position. But the subsequent step, competing against and beating legendary figures like Alcaraz, the Italian, and including a declining Djokovic, is the toughest of all. What was Fowler thinking? That the American, in 2025, was a serious threat to defeat them all back-to-back? That it was appropriate mentioning the continuing drought of US male players winning grand slams when Fritz had departed the New York major in the quarter-finals? The thirst is simply too much and the respect for the magnitude of the task insufficient.

Taylor Fritz made a career-best run to the All England Club last four in the summer.

Fritz’s play in that very last eight match ought to have been enough of an indication. The Serbian won in four sets, a victory that only seemed tenuous for brief periods towards the conclusion, when the American had saved a few match points and had a opportunity to maintain serve for 5-5. The duo looked evenly matched during the exchanges, with the American earning plenty of opportunities to win the opponent's serve. But the champion rescued service break opportunity after service break opportunity, extending the streak to the point of frustration. When Fritz finally did convert a single of the opportunities at 5-5 in the second set, he immediately produced a horrendous game to drop serve again; the Serbian had drawn him into a skirmish peripheral to the real battle and compelled him to expend excessive energy to win it. Facing set points in the final game, Fritz’s first serve floated to heaven. He prolonged the match two times on his backup delivery, but ultimately committed two errors. It was not a choke, I didn’t think, just a consequence of needing to hit an excessive number of second serves.

The match was quite compelling evidence that the American is not good enough to beat any form of Djokovic, that lost to Alcaraz in the following match and never especially appeared like he believed he could triumph. This is absolutely fine – the Serbian is the best player ever, and might not be at the height of his physical powers now, but has developed enough experience and tactical know-how to compensate for a significant portion of the decline. The issue is those who were anticipating Fritz to prevail, and putting pressure on him to do so, when he was yet to accomplished anything that suggested he would.

The American is an asset to the circuit regardless. He’s a patient, reflective voice in press conferences, exceeding virtually anyone on the ATP aside from Daniil Medvedev, willing to not just express his emotions or the strategy he believed decided a contest, but explain it. That he should shoulder the majority of the blame for the United States not produce a men's grand slam winner since Andy Roddick seems unjust. (Now that the fellow American is rubbing shoulders with him in the rankings, perhaps they can share that burden.)

Year-End Championships: Singles Groups

American legend Division

• Carlos Alcaraz (Sp)
• The American contender
• The Australian speedster
• The Italian stylist

Swedish icon Division

• The Italian champion
• The German powerhouse
• Ben Shelton (US)
• The Canadian talent

“I’d probably think about it indefinitely if I fail to accomplish it,” the American informed an interviewer in June of claiming a major. It is hoped he understands that he’s not a failure if he does not achieve that objective, that breaking through Alcaraz and Sinner’s dominant, formidable reign is in fact highly improbable for all other players. {